The debate as to whether industrialization has been beneficial or
detrimental to art has valid arguments on both sides.
Walter Benjamin argues that
mechanical reproduction, a major byproduct of industrialization, has
depreciated the authenticity of art.
This is very serious since he believes “the authenticity of a thing is the
essence of all that is transmissible from its beginning” (Benjamin). Thus, mechanical reproduction of art, such as
photography, destroys the very essence of the art work.
Benjamin even goes as
far to argue that film has depreciated the experience of art to that of “absent-minded”
distraction as opposed to that of contemplation (Benjamin).
On the other hand,
industrialization has created new forms of art never before imagined. As alluded to above, industrialization made
the production of film possible. (http://inventors.about.com/od/estartinventors/ss/George_Eastman.htm)
Kodak film factory worker. (http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/emissourian.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/8/0f/80fc8890-42b7-11e1-9cb2-0019bb2963f4/4f183f7303755.preview-300.jpg)
Film and the motion picture have brought contemplation and imagination
to the masses. For example, Star Trek
not only empowered the futuristic imagination of space exploration, wireless
communication, and even cyborgs, but it also raised questions of human ethics
that would not have been available to the masses if it were not for the
production of film.
http://www.imdb.com/list/g1v-idg7IsI/
http://www.edrobertson.com/ethics.htm
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20081121204425/memoryalpha/en/images/thumb/3/36/The_Ethics_of_Star_Trek_alternate.jpg/118px-The_Ethics_of_Star_Trek_alternate.jpg
http://www.imdb.com/list/g1v-idg7IsI/
http://www.edrobertson.com/ethics.htm
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20081121204425/memoryalpha/en/images/thumb/3/36/The_Ethics_of_Star_Trek_alternate.jpg/118px-The_Ethics_of_Star_Trek_alternate.jpg
After analyzing both sides of the argument, I believe that instead of
looking at whether industrialization was beneficial or detrimental to art and
society as a whole, we should acknowledge that the very nature of art is
fluid. New forms of art arise, while old
forms of art wither away. We must accept
this as the flow of nature, for better or for worse. Its affect on society is just another
contributing factor to the evolution of man.
Evolution of Portrait (http://char.txa.cornell.edu/art/portr.gif)
Works Cited
Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. London: Penguin, 2008. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment